The Year AI Got Practical: What B2B Marketers Took From 2025

January 7, 2026 Mark Emond

If 2023 was the year AI became possible, and 2024 was the year AI became interesting, then 2025 was the year AI became…useful.

That was the clear mood in Demand Spring’s final AI Exchange of 2025: less hype, more hard-won lessons.

Participants weren’t debating whether AI “works” anymore. They were sharing how it’s already reshaping the day-to-day reality of B2B marketing operations, compliance, and strategic planning.

Across industries (healthcare, B2B services, consulting, and marketing), the same sentiment kept surfacing:

AI isn’t replacing teams. It’s reclaiming time.

Here’s how the group reflected on the year that was—and what it signals for B2B marketing leaders heading into 2026.

 

The biggest win of 2025: automation finally moved “up the value chain”

What stood out most was where AI made the biggest difference.

Not in novelty experiments. Not in “write me a blog post” prompts.

The real impact came from automating work that is:

  • Repetitive
  • Time-consuming
  • High-risk (compliance-heavy)
  • Mission-critical (operational visibility)

Participants repeatedly described AI as a way to remove manual burden from marketing ops and adjacent teams.

One marketing operations leader shared how they automated recurring reporting workflows by connecting their BI and CRM data to an AI-powered interface. What used to take anywhere from 20 minutes to an hour could now be completed in minutes, with the added bonus of exploring KPI cuts dynamically rather than rebuilding reports.

Another participant working in regulated industries described a compliance chatbot that could provide instant, sourced answers to policy questions, cutting through slow, manual research loops and reducing dependency on “who knows what” inside the organization.

And a third participant highlighted one of the most quietly transformative wins of the year: automated vendor risk assessments.

Instead of manually filling out long forms based on vendor websites and documentation, a custom AI workflow could ingest a URL and complete most of the assessment automatically.

These weren’t flashy use cases. That’s exactly the point.

2025’s breakthroughs were practical, applied to where teams feel the pain most.

 

The mindset shift: “failed projects” aren’t failures. They’re tool timing issues.

One of the most useful themes in the discussion was the group’s evolving relationship with disappointment.

Several participants described projects that didn’t meet expectations, especially when using general-purpose LLMs for specialized work like:

  • Image generation that meets brand standards
  • Pixel-perfect PowerPoint creation
  • Complex code snippets that run correctly on the first try

But rather than concluding “AI can’t do that,” the group framed these as tool-specific limitations, not proof the use case is wrong.

The shared takeaway was surprisingly disciplined:

Re-test high-value AI use cases quarterly.

Not because teams enjoy re-running experiments, but because tool capability is changing fast enough that a “no” in March can become a “yes” by September, especially when you switch from a general model to a purpose-built tool.

Participants pointed to specialized tools for presentations as a good example: in areas like slide creation and layout, tools built for the job can outperform general LLMs, even if the underlying model isn’t radically different.

In other words, the lesson of 2025 wasn’t “AI fails sometimes.”

It was: your evaluation cadence needs to match the pace of the market.

 

The strategic trend: tech stack consolidation (and AI is the new “center of gravity”)

One of the strongest strategic signals from the group was the move toward tech consolidation, specifically consolidation around AI-native platforms.

Multiple participants described being in (or planning) a shift away from “a dozen point solutions” toward fewer platforms with broader capabilities.

One marketing leader shared their 2025 journey inheriting a fragmented stack and using AI as the foundation for rebuilding. The goal wasn’t simply to reduce tools, it was to reduce complexity and increase leverage.

Two categories stood out in the consolidation conversation:

  • Marketing automation platforms with native AI as a core feature, not an add-on
  • Data enrichment / routing platforms aiming to replace multiple specialized tools (lead-to-account matching, email validation, enrichment workflows, etc.)

Underneath this was a pragmatic belief: AI’s value compounds when it sits at the center of workflows, not on the edge.

Teams aren’t looking for “one more tool.”

They’re looking for one fewer system to maintain.

 

The sleeper hit of 2025: custom GPTs (especially for synthetic expert panels)

If automation was the headline, then custom GPTs were the surprise MVP.

Participants saw custom GPTs not just as productivity tools, but as repeatable systems—something you can operationalize inside a team without needing a full engineering lift.

Two use cases landed especially well:

A) Automating repetitive, structured work

Vendor assessments were the clearest example: a custom GPT could follow a consistent structure, apply the same evaluation criteria, and complete outputs that previously drained hours from subject-matter experts.

B) “Synthetic expert panels” for message testing

This idea got a lot of energy in the room: using multiple custom GPTs, each embodying a different persona or perspective, to pressure-test messaging before it goes to market.

Instead of asking one teammate to roleplay a persona (or relying on a single ICP assumption), marketers can simulate a panel: customer types, skeptics, champions, budget holders, and even internal stakeholders, at once.

Participants described this as a leap forward from single-persona testing. It wasn’t seen as a perfect replacement for customer research, but it was seen as a dramatically better first-pass filter for positioning and clarity.

The underlying sentiment:

AI isn’t just helping teams create faster. It’s helping them think better before they ship.

 

What participants felt most strongly: AI is becoming “invisible infrastructure”

Across the conversation, the emotional tone wasn’t fear or hype. It was something more like… steady confidence.

Participants sounded like people who’ve moved past novelty and into integration.

AI in 2025 felt like:

  • A new operational layer
  • A workflow enhancer
  • A force-multiplier
  • Something that sits quietly in the background making work less painful

The year wasn’t defined by one magical breakthrough.

It was defined by a hundred small wins that added up to something meaningful: more time for strategy, fewer hours lost to manual work, and clearer paths to scale.

 

The practical playbook they’d carry into 2026

If you stitched together the advice implicit in the roundtable, the 2026 playbook looks like this:

1) Start with operational friction

Don’t begin with “what’s cool.” Begin with “what’s repeated, painful, and important.”

2) Treat AI projects like product iterations

Assume you’ll revisit, refine, and re-test, especially as new tools emerge.

3) Consolidate tools with intention

AI will increase complexity if it’s added haphazardly. It reduces complexity when it becomes the connective tissue between systems.

4) Build custom GPTs for repeatable workflows

Use them to enforce consistency, reduce manual work, and create “always-on” support systems for teams.

5) Pair instructions with knowledge

Participants emphasized a clear best practice: store factual content in knowledge files and use instructions to define behavior and output expectations. That’s how you get reliability and repeatability.

 

The bottom line: 2025 was the year B2B marketers stopped asking “Can AI help?” and started asking “Where do we scale next?”

The closing feeling from the final AI Exchange of 2025 was not that AI is finished evolving—it’s that the conversation has evolved.

AI is no longer a side experiment.

It’s becoming part of the operating system for modern B2B marketing teams.

And the teams who learned the most in 2025 weren’t necessarily the ones who tried the most tools.

They were the ones who:

  • Focused on real business pain
  • Built repeatable workflows
  • Treated AI as infrastructure
  • Stayed disciplined about learning, testing, and iterating

In other words: the year AI got practical. Want in on the next conversation? Sign-up to our AI Exchange.

The post The Year AI Got Practical: What B2B Marketers Took From 2025 appeared first on Demand Spring.

No Previous Articles

Next Article
Traditional SEO vs. AI Search: The Difference Between Being Found and Being Chosen
Traditional SEO vs. AI Search: The Difference Between Being Found and Being Chosen

Discover how MOPs & RevOps leaders are AI upskilling for operations teams. Get key insights on future AI sk...